MATRAKA14

Members
  • Content count

    75
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Time Online

    649d 18h 22m 14s

Community Reputation

74 Excellent

About MATRAKA14

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

ITS

  • ITS PIN L3120

Recent Profile Visitors

366 profile views
  1. @Graviton How is segmented? how many pieces does it have?
  2. The black jack right now it's really good, the autocannon is cool and all but the t2 sniper grants you a good range in turn 1. Also i prefer the current price rather than the addition of fatality. The current profile is awesome, take a look at the Haqq S5 and you will see why. Foxtrot minelayer is a nonsense. first of all because it could easily brake balance for vanilla ariadna, also why do you want minelayers when you have the cheapest FO infiltrator, and the hard case to spam camos and shotguns? Minutemen are a little bit unattractive but not because the marauder core but because you loose the option of making the grunt core with the extra haris, Also they are quite risky to field against templates, EM, etc. In their defence i must say they are really really good at shoting down stuff during the active turn and its posible to fit them in a 18+ orders list, additionally the FO can be useful improvised aro pieces due the excellent range of the flash pulse + link bonuses. But yes at the end of the day the grunt core + the marauder haris is the way to go, its a shame because i really like the minutemen miniatures, if they had a haris profile ... now that could be quite interesting ...
  3. Considering balance: Marauders, grunts and black jacks are fine. The airborne doesn't need marksman rifles or mines, don't expect mines for ariadna paratroopers. Traktor muls need some kind of rework, additionally a new more direct action profile could be fun, but don't expect anything that can overlap other units with those kind of weapons. (Even with that is not going to happen soon). @Talon65 Foxtrots are good at being cheap, they don't need minelayer because you can take hardcases, also a new minelayer profile for Ariadna is a bad idea, we have enough with 2 chesaurs minelayers. Why FO hard case? you have foxtrots for that.
  4. D-CHARGES!. Hackers are a thing but the lack of d-charges in USARF has no excuse, the classified objectives end up being just annoying, and now the only way to deal with the new power pack without taking panoplies is a single Dozer (ava1) that has to cross the table (The T2 cc weapon is not antimaterial). The airborne seem a good option for a profile with d-charges to compensate the lack of mimetism compared to the other paratroopers. Thats the only thing i ask for. i mean yeah a minuteman paramedic could be awesome and help them to be more attractive compared to marauders (or at least not so risky to field) But in general everything seems fine except minor details like some costs or profiles (maverick molotok, unknown ranger) With the day dreaming mode on, I could ask for a synchronized land drone, or just anything mechanized with current tech.
  5. Awesome
  6. the T2 ccw seems to lack the anti-material atribute. @Savnock Yes its posible to make one list with each sectorial, but try to make a list with mrrf without taking the anaconda and mirage team together. Usarf has somewhat a couple more options but overall all 3 are extremely limited if you intend to achieve 300p 6 cap. The point is that if you try to make a list for a specific ITS mission and compare it with competitive lists of other factions you will see the gap between them.
  7. How is usarf supposed to destroy a pac? bike spam if they can access the panoplies? Also limited insertion feels really unbalanced specially for ariadna sectorials, and that's considering 300 p matches, 400 are unplayable.
  8. The black jack profile is absolutely fine, the hmg one seems somewhat more difficult to fit in my lists outside limited insertion. Overall their best strength is the price. As an aro piece at that price the t2 can make a lot of damage and if he fails its not as harmful as losing other premium aro pieces like the yuan huo. Personally i'm ready to rock them Madox style! (except for the price, if they end up at 35$ ... especially when it's an oversized s5 miniature there is no reason to make it that big except for making it more expensive)
  9. I really dislike the xvisor profile (linked) the FO are cheapear and can save your life with flash pulse. The xvisor is too expensive. The guy by itself can be used as supresive fire turret if the mission demands it.
  10. Now that lo-tech is a thing, probably they are going to get something with that rule. Now that lo-tech is a thing, probably they are going to get something with that rule. Now that lo-tech is a thing, probably they are going to get something with that rule.
  11. How scores are managed if ariadna got the highest amount of campaign points? Highest amount of campaign points means ariadna won the campaign? If the sistem looks for report rates, downvoting the reports of a faction is a valid way to negate the points of your enemies?
  12. Another option for cavalry is a haris of riot horses with loup garous.
  13. I don't know the more i think about it the more sense it makes to me, ariadna has so many s2 miniatures and needs more variety to spice things up visually. A couple of new remotes or a g:servant, a tag, a micro vehicle could make so much sense.
  14. Another one, im not sure if it will be the last one for me. https://wotan.warconsole.com/battles/sergej-vs-krossaks-1500485384
  15. The patches made by Erik have arrived from united states to spain, and they look incredible. i love them!