Skoll

Warcors
  • Content count

    423
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Time Online

    466d 4h 42m 43s

Community Reputation

284 Excellent

About Skoll

  • Rank
    Mayanaut

Recent Profile Visitors

802 profile views
  1. I had honestly forgotten the rasyat were even a thing o.0
  2. @Daboarder how would you feel about decent cc and ma or just plain stealth on the crusader as a niche? Is there currently a cc ad trooper ?
  3. Ewww tau, we are more like ig if anything, since IG also has troops. That pretend they know the good side of a bayonet.
  4. If you cant be bothered to look up things that have been argued a million times why should anybody waste time arguing with you. Your argument boils down to a child saying "nuh, uh" really loud, which i find tiresome in an adult. Simply because you refuse to look back at threads you claim you've already seen and read, which contain extensive number crunching and explanations of the issues that were simplified for your understanding doesnt mean i have to go fetch it and enumerate it nicely for you. Im done replying to you, because talking to you adds nothing to the discussion and it is a waste of my and others' time. Go have that drink or whatever.
  5. Hey man if you wanna purposely ignore all the discussion about what pano is lacking that has been done in prior threads, that you clearly acknowledge have happened, because you are bitching about the amount of threads that take that discussion up, well that is on you. But don't pretend that these problems havent been put forth time and again and almost every time with sensible solutions. Let's just list a few for you. Lack of effective ways to get specialists to objectives up the table without simply shooting your way there. It doesnt have to be regular smoke, eclipse smoke will do just as well. Lack of effective ways to answer warbands that consistently trade up in points, g synch units are supposed to be the answer but are nowhere near the wide availability to reliably solve the problem. Consistent design limitations on because no "stepping on other factions toes" no such limitations on other factions getting better shooting capabilities. Tons of mediocre profiles with simple solutions which would make them playable and give list variance. No cost variance to msv regardless of it having hampered utility due to lack of smoke Im sure others here can continue the list . But you probably dont care to read them. Also it's funny how you say linkable heavy infantry should be answer to warbands when other factions just get both.
  6. Because even weak units tend to have 1 to 2 armor while a lot of those will still have 0 bts, so the odds tend to be on the nanopulsers favor
  7. Honestly i wish the montesa had access to a light shotgun or there was a way to start the game in supressive fire (which to my knowledge there isn't but I'd be happy to be corrected)
  8. I remember someone mentioning a few pages back that at least the swiss guard isnt wielding the greatsword. But then i realized on the box art the swiss guard is using it as his primary weapon.
  9. But maybe the box swiss does have nice cc for the newbies, and is cc 23 TO . A piece MO would have loved in NCA in true CB fashion at this point of saying Pano can eat it.
  10. Is it made from the Grinch s heart ?cuz it certainly grew in size
  11. I'll be honest im getting the box solely for the Swiss guard which will be converted into knight . Everything else strikes me as meh. Also waiting on the hospitaller resculpt that we are supposed to see this year >.>
  12. Yeah, you just caught me editing. I went to the wiki to clarify and it is phrased in a different way in the clarification example than it used to be.
  13. From my reading of the confere knight rule you may only ever have two named knight orders. One primary and one secondary. Therefore 3 separate knightly orders violates the rule. Edit- i see that has been clarified in the wiki now. The confere may be any two other knights not belonging to the primary order
  14. This list is actually illegal due to the conferre knight rule. You are allowed 4 of 1 type of knight order and 2 of a second one. I would follow the advise above and paint your father knight in hospitaller colors. Or at least use the teuton as a magister(they are nearly identical) and make at minimum a 3 man link with 2 magisters and 1 hospitaller. Make the santiago your lt , give him a spitfire and make the father knight and assault hacker for a tough specialist. Some modified version of this would prob suit you best. Also you can start the 2 magisters linked to the santiago for sweet sweet burst 5 spitfire. Remember that the TO camo forward observer has no model and can be appropiately proxied by any order sgt. Military Orders──────────────────────────────────────────────────9 2KNIGHT OF SANTIAGO Lieutenant Spitfire, Nanopulser, E/M Grenades / Pistol, AP CCW. (1 | 44) MAGISTER KNIGHT Panzerfaust, Light Shotgun / Pistol, DA CCW. (0 | 23) MAGISTER KNIGHT Panzerfaust, Light Shotgun / Pistol, AP CCW. (0 | 22) KNIGHT HOSPITALLER Doctor (MediKit) MULTI Rifle / Pistol, AP CCW. (0 | 41) FATHER-KNIGHT Hacker (Assault Hacking Device) Combi Rifle, D-Charges / Breaker Pistol, DA CCW. (0.5 | 50) SPEC. SERGEANT (CH: TO Camouflage, Infiltration, Forward Observer) Combi Rifle, Antipersonnel Mines / Pistol, Knife. (0 | 27) SPEC. SERGEANT (CH: TO Camouflage, Infiltration, Forward Observer) Combi Rifle, Antipersonnel Mines / Pistol, Knife. (0 | 27) SPEC. SERGEANT (CH: TO Camouflage, Infiltration, Forward Observer) Combi Rifle, Antipersonnel Mines / Pistol, Knife. (0 | 27) SPEC. SERGEANT (CH: TO Camouflage, Infiltration) MULTI Sniper Rifle / Pistol, Knife. (1.5 | 33) 3 SWC | 294 PointsOpen in Infinity Army
  15. The torso are almost the exact same size. The legs and arms are however significantly shorter and less bulky. It's easier to see when they are both armless side by side.