• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Time Online

    228d 5h 17m 39s

Community Reputation

122 Excellent

About Zewrath

  • Rank


  • ITS PIN E9241

Recent Profile Visitors

573 profile views
  1. So you literally made Minelayers useless? Also, there's no "agreeing" part. The smoke ruling was 100% wrong and so is this Camo ruling.
  2. Right.. So because of a faulty ruling, in a tournament filled with casual players (even though it's branded as some kind of Infinity Olympics), the same tournament that ruled a dispute over smoke in a demonstrably wrong ruling. THAT’S the best argument people have for public camo tokens? Sorry, but there’s no need to wait for any clarification on this matter and anything ruled otherwise is simply CB changing their minds and being inconsistent with the rules, because the reason for combat group is private information has been demonstrated multiple times in this thread already. Although to be honest, this wouldn’t be the first time CB have been inconsistent with rules. My biggest pet peeve is prone being cancelled by Jump. It is absurd that you can do it and you can clearly and easily break down the rules of why that shouldn’t be possible, using the rule book itself. The only reason you’re allowed is because Palanka said “you can. Lol kthxbai” in a thread 2 years and now it’s the “official” ruling, although you’ll never find that ruling anywhere in the wiki.
  3. Why is this thread still a thing? It’s almost 2 years old.
  4. Is that how smoke works, when thrown on ground? It covers the bottom partially and then proceeds to cover the top 100%? that seems insanely exploitative and unintuitive. Is it even compatible with the illustration from wiki on template area of effect? Has this question been answered by CB? Legit curious about this. Seems wrong.
  5. Damn dude! That gecko looks dope! Who made it?
  6. Why are you making unfunny memes? Are you really that butthurt that you were less capable of making arguments than Robock? Sad neck beard is sad.
  7. Finally, someone with an actual argument. Yes I will concede to your point.
  8. You’re breaking down a straw man and I’m baffled as to why you’re doing it. Please address why you think you should be able to hand over a courtesy list with 7 orders, when in truth there’s only 5. You can’t.
  9. Again, didn’t say that, so entirely correct. Can we move on please? People attempting semantics are extremely boring.
  10. No, I have it entirely correct. I never claimed what you’re trying to correct me for.
  11. It’s not a bug, it’s the rules. The status of your orderpool is open information, aka. information you are REQUIRED to share, so handing over a list with fake orders that are never generated would be cheating. The exception to this are units in Hidden Deployment, which have special rules that allows you to hide the order that the unit generates.
  12. But doesn’t that mean, that AD troops can land on rooftops, provided there’s room to do so? I was under the impression that such a thing was not legal, as buildings are scenery.
  13. I think it's because it's in conflict with the fluff about the Full Auto rule. Supposedly you get the burst and the negative modifier because you shoot at enemies, holding in the trigger and firing in fully automatic mode, suppressing the enemy that tries to retaliate. Missile Launchers and Heavy Rocket Launchers are not weapons that are capable of sustaining a rate of fire, in a way that justifies granting the rule.
  14. I've never seen such a bad FAQ for a long time... can't remember last time when there was such a big confusion over an FAQ, with mounting, new shock rulings and now discussions arrising from other ammo type...